Comments on: Clarke Awards http://soreeyes.org/archive/2003/02/27/clarke-awards/ Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:32:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Nicklas http://soreeyes.org/archive/2003/02/27/clarke-awards/#comment-22898 Nicklas Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:20:16 +0000 http://soreeyes.org/archive/2003/02/27/clarke-awards/#comment-22898 Read two (Mieville and Harrison; very good both of them and worthy the award) and own a third (Priest). I agree with you on the book by Elizabeth Moon. What I've read by her before hasn't been too good so I was a bit sceptical, but the review seem to indicate that this might be different. But give in. Money exists only for one purpose: to make books inhabit shelf-space. Read two (Mieville and Harrison; very good both of them and worthy the award) and own a third (Priest). I agree with you on the book by Elizabeth Moon. What I’ve read by her before hasn’t been too good so I was a bit sceptical, but the review seem to indicate that this might be different.

But give in. Money exists only for one purpose: to make books inhabit shelf-space.

]]> By: ext|circ http://soreeyes.org/archive/2003/02/27/clarke-awards/#comment-22899 ext|circ Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:42:28 +0000 http://soreeyes.org/archive/2003/02/27/clarke-awards/#comment-22899 <strong>Friday morning</strong> Get the Mac stuff out of the way first, as usual: Keynote has been updated Hyatt's great: hypothetically speaking...... Friday morning

Get the Mac stuff out of the way first, as usual: Keynote has been updated Hyatt’s great: hypothetically speaking……

]]>