Comments on: Physical Theories as Women http://soreeyes.org/archive/2004/07/30/physical-theories-as-women/ Thu, 4 Dec 2008 22:42:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: John http://soreeyes.org/archive/2004/07/30/physical-theories-as-women/#comment-24035 John Tue, 03 Aug 2004 22:07:52 +0000 http://soreeyes.org/archive/2004/07/30/physical-theories-as-women/#comment-24035 <applause>Oh, bravo Sir!</applause> <applause>Oh, bravo Sir!</applause>

]]> By: Gary Farber http://soreeyes.org/archive/2004/07/30/physical-theories-as-women/#comment-24034 Gary Farber Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:28:38 +0000 http://soreeyes.org/archive/2004/07/30/physical-theories-as-women/#comment-24034 I am, it appears, your only reader who finds this stimulating, arousing, and exciting. Relatively speaking. It's a leap above other notions! I hope she is just not stringing me on. Myself, I wouldn't mind dating the First Law of Thermodynamics,but it's clear the Second Law is a bad date. Commenting further, gravity increases, as does time and length. I am, it appears, your only reader who finds this stimulating, arousing, and exciting.

Relatively speaking. It’s a leap above other notions! I hope she is just not stringing me on.

Myself, I wouldn’t mind dating the First Law of Thermodynamics,but it’s clear the Second Law is a bad date.

Commenting further, gravity increases, as does time and length.

]]>