Reading David Mery's article in today's Guardian about his experience of being arrested not so much for something he did as for "acting suspiciously" is deeply disturbing. This is Mery's account of his arrest:
7.21 pm: I enter Southwark tube station, passing uniformed police by the entrance, and more police beyond the gate. I walk down to the platform, peering down at the steps as, thanks to a small eye infection, I'm wearing specs instead of my usual contact lenses. The next train is scheduled to arrive in a few minutes. As other people drift on to the platform, I sit down against the wall with my rucksack still on my back. I check for messages on my phone, then take out a printout of an article about Wikipedia from inside my jacket and begin to read.
The train enters the station. Uniformed police officers appear on the platform and surround me. They must immediately notice my French accent, still strong after living more than 12 years in London.
They handcuff me, hands behind my back, and take my rucksack out of my sight. They explain that this is for my safety, and that they are acting under the authority of the Terrorism Act. I am told that I am being stopped and searched because:
- they found my behaviour suspicious from direct observation and then from watching me on the CCTV system;
- I went into the station without looking at the police officers at the entrance or by the gates;
- two other men entered the station at about the same time as me;
- I am wearing a jacket "too warm for the season";
- I am carrying a bulky rucksack, and kept my rucksack with me at all times;
- I looked at people coming on the platform;
- I played with my phone and then took a paper from inside my jacket.
After this, Mery was about to be released until another officer appeared and ordered him handcuffed again. After he was taken to the police station for questioning his flat was searched and various bits of computer kit taken away, and his DNA was sampled to keep on file regardless of the outcome of the investigation. While he was at the station, an officer gave Mery the following explanation of the decision to take him into custody after all:
The officer explains what made them change their mind and arrest me. Apparently, on August 4, 2004, there was a firearms incident at the company where I work. The next day I find out that there had been a hoax call the previous year, apparently from a temp claiming there was an armed intruder. Some staff had also been seen photographing tube stations with a camera phone. On June 2, as part of a team-building exercise, new colleagues were supposed to photograph landmarks and try to get a picture of themselves with a policeman.
How's that for an illustration of the dangers of the Database State? So much information, so little idea of what the hell it all means, so many ways to join the dots, so many of them utterly wrong and downright harmful.
Just imagine how much more damage the Database State will be able to do if EU proposals to require retention of years-worth of data on our internet and mobile phone usage go through. If you find the idea deeply scary, you might want to visit www.openrightsgroup.org, the fledgeling web presence of the Open Rights Group and consider signing the European Digital Rights petition.