Comments on: Living in 2006 http://soreeyes.org/archive/2006/03/24/living-in-2006/ Mon, 14 May 2012 14:07:12 +0000 hourly 1 By: John http://soreeyes.org/archive/2006/03/24/living-in-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-7890 John Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:44:14 +0000 http://soreeyes.org/?p=903#comment-7890 Martin, that's a good point. I'm sure that's the explanation. Martin, that's a good point. I'm sure that's the explanation.

]]> By: Martin Wisse http://soreeyes.org/archive/2006/03/24/living-in-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-7888 Martin Wisse Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:01:20 +0000 http://soreeyes.org/?p=903#comment-7888 "Surely #12 is a bit 1999? Wouldn’t “You’re going to post this on your weblog the first chance you get” be a better fit for 2006?" That's because this was originally written <i>in</i> 1999, if not earlier. Actually, it would not surprise me if you haven't published this before... "Surely #12 is a bit 1999? Wouldn’t “You’re going to post this on your weblog the first chance you get” be a better fit for 2006?"

That's because this was originally written in 1999, if not earlier.

Actually, it would not surprise me if you haven't published this before…

]]> By: Martine http://soreeyes.org/archive/2006/03/24/living-in-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-7873 Martine Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:57:27 +0000 http://soreeyes.org/?p=903#comment-7873 Thanks Mr Sore Eyes, that was hilarious and yes, I am going to take your suggestion and amend the <em>very 1999</em> #12 to: You are going to post this on your blog first chance you get (which is exactly what I'm gonna do). Thanks Mr Sore Eyes, that was hilarious and yes, I am going to take your suggestion and amend the very 1999 #12 to: You are going to post this on your blog first chance you get (which is exactly what I'm gonna do).

]]>