<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soreeyes.org/archive/2007/03/29/quick-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2007/03/29/quick-change/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2007/03/29/quick-change/#comment-58082</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/archive/2007/03/29/quick-change/#comment-58082</guid>
		<description>"I can imagine their act being less impressive with each repetition;"

Sure, the point peers made was slightly different in that they had nothing else, everything they did was a variation on the same trick and while impressive it wasn't enough to win a contest on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can imagine their act being less impressive with each repetition;&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure, the point peers made was slightly different in that they had nothing else, everything they did was a variation on the same trick and while impressive it wasn&#8217;t enough to win a contest on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2007/03/29/quick-change/#comment-57972</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/archive/2007/03/29/quick-change/#comment-57972</guid>
		<description>I don't watch as much TV as I should, it seems...

I can imagine their act being less impressive with each repetition; when you've seen ten rapid costume change reveals you'll be much less impressed by number 11, and by number 20 you'd be changing the channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t watch as much TV as I should, it seems&#8230;</p>
<p>I can imagine their act being less impressive with each repetition; when you&#8217;ve seen ten rapid costume change reveals you&#8217;ll be much less impressed by number 11, and by number 20 you&#8217;d be changing the channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2007/03/29/quick-change/#comment-57950</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/archive/2007/03/29/quick-change/#comment-57950</guid>
		<description>I guess you didn't see America's got talent either, John! Simon Cowell is doing a British version on ITV1 soon, I think he made the US version but didn't appear on screen. They used Piers Morgan, Brandy and David Hasselhoff.

David and Dania were impressive the first time but their act was essentially the same EVERY time. When criticised they were pretty rude about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you didn&#8217;t see America&#8217;s got talent either, John! Simon Cowell is doing a British version on ITV1 soon, I think he made the US version but didn&#8217;t appear on screen. They used Piers Morgan, Brandy and David Hasselhoff.</p>
<p>David and Dania were impressive the first time but their act was essentially the same EVERY time. When criticised they were pretty rude about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
