« Fray | Main | LOTR Laughter »

January 18, 2004

Without a Trace

Channel 4 are proving as adept as ever at raising my blood pressure. On the one hand, season 3 of Six Foot Under arrives on 29 January, albeit in the same late-evening slot Channel 4 assign all their HBO dramas nowadays. The third season seems to have had mixed reviews, but I'm glad of the chance to see for myself and at least it isn't starting after midnight (so far).

On the other hand, Channel 4 have managed to screw up their new missing-persons drama Without a Trace after just one episode. I rather enjoyed what I took to be the premiere episode last week; Anthony LaPaglia is a dependable performer (except when he's competing with Jane Leeves for the honour of creating the Worst British Accent Every on US Television in his occasional guest appearences on Frasier), the members of the FBI Missing Persons unit his character led seemed like a real team rather than a group of contrasting personalities thrown together to create conflict in future episodes, the storyline was less predictable than you might expect and the performances by guest stars David Paymer and Megan Gallagher were well up to scratch.

There's just one problem: this "first" episode of their "new US drama" was in fact the second episode of the first US season, which would explain why so much was made of how Eric Close's character was in the doghouse for something he'd done while investigating a previous case. At the time I assumed this was a clever way to remind viewers that the characters we were watching had had been together some time before we happened to start looking over their shoulders, whereas in fact it was simply that they were referring to events in the show's pilot episode (which, oddly enough, was shown under a different title, Vanished.)

I've since checked the listings and it turns out that the next two episodes Channel 4 are showing will be episodes 5 and 11 of that first season. If the show turns out to focus solely on the characters' working lives, and if there are no personnel changes within the team, and if they don't develop the interpersonal relationships within the team, then the series' continuity might not be badly harmed by this treatment. But that's an awful lot of "ifs". It's much more likely that what is by all accounts a pretty decent police procedural drama is going to be horribly screwed up by Channel 4's schedulers.

Posted by John at January 18, 2004 08:37 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://soreeyes.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1072

Comments

Have never 'commented' before but I have to say I totally agree about C4. They drive me nuts by importing great series from the US, waiting until they have a good following, then showing the next series on E4 and making those of us who stick to terrestial wait forever to see it and then it is on at some godforesaken hour! I too thought that the 'first' episode of Without a Trace seemed to lack an introduction to the characters. Now all is clear!

Posted by: Angela at January 20, 2004 08:05 PM

I didn't mind the "show new seasons first on E4" policy all that much - in the end, they've got to persuade people to subscribe somehow - but it's the post-midnight timeslots and/or next to no advertising that get to me.

I really can't understand why they're cutting out large chunks of the first season of Without a Trace. Unless whichever executive bought the rights to the show has moved on and his/her successor has decided to ensure that the show gets low ratings.

The pity of it is, the only terrestrial channel which offers any sort of competition for C4 for these shows - BBC2 - is equally leery of showing imported shows in weekday prime time. It's as if they're conspiring to force us all to switch to cable/satellite TV.

Posted by: John at January 20, 2004 11:12 PM

Just so you know... the only reason why LaPaglia may not have the best British accent is because he's actually an Aussie, and as you should notice, they're not the same thing.

Not to be a pain, but just something to know.

Posted by: Lauren at May 22, 2004 04:54 PM

I know LaPaglia's Australian, but that doesn't excuse that accent.

It's probably as much the fault of the producers as it is the actor: after all, they thought Daphne's Manchester accent was a good idea, which tells us all we need to know about their commitment to accuracy in accents.

Posted by: John at May 22, 2004 10:22 PM

As a londoner, I'd say that LaPaglia's accent on Frasier is one of the best I've heard by an "american" actor. It is OTT but it's still got the essance of a London accent, compared to say Dick Van Dyke's accent in Mary Poppins which was OTT but sounds american underneath

Posted by: Simon at May 23, 2004 01:56 AM

I'll have to defer to your expertise on that point: I just hear the OTT-ness, but I'll admit to being something less than an expert on London accents.

[However, I can't resist observing that comparing LaPaglia's accent favourably with Dick Van Dyke's effort is the very definition of the phrase "damning it with faint praise."]

Posted by: John at May 24, 2004 07:05 PM

Lol!

Well my example was meant to represent those actors who get the OTT bit but still sound like an american trying to sound british

BTW, did you see my post about Mathew fox?

Posted by: Simon at May 24, 2004 08:17 PM

Yes, I saw your other comment. I'm dividing my time this evening between catching up with weblogs I've neglected to read and catching up with comments I'd neglected to reply to. I'm planning to at least catch up on the comments front before the night is out, but even if I don't rest assured that I always read comments as soon as I'm notified of them: it's getting round to framing a coherent reply that's the tricky bit...

Posted by: John at May 24, 2004 09:24 PM

Cool, I just thought you might have missed it.

Oddly enough tonights Without a Trace guest stars Tom Irwin, Angela's dad on My so-called life. What a coincidence!

Posted by: Simon at May 24, 2004 11:04 PM

And oddly enough I'm watching it as I type this, and I was going to mention that very same point.

Spooky...

Posted by: John at May 24, 2004 11:18 PM

Did you recognise him then? I have to say I thought I recognised him but wondered if it was the actor who played Phil in Neighbours but a search revealed the truth

Posted by: Simon at May 25, 2004 01:18 AM

Yes, I spotted him immediately.

Besides, the only former Neighbour who seems to be getting work in US TV nowadays is Jim Robinson. (See The OC, 24, ER, The West Wing.)

Posted by: John at May 25, 2004 10:51 PM

Not entirely true (though Alan Dale's done surprisingly well)

Guy Pearce, Russel Crow (admitedly they're more film people)

Kimberly Davis (I think) was in an ep of Friends the other week.

Melissa George is doing really well (though she was in H&A)Can't stand her though

Posted by: Simon at May 26, 2004 07:20 PM

Kimberley Davies seems to be working steadily, but mostly in little one-off roles rather than in series. Who knows, perhaps her guest-starring role in Friends will open up some doors. (I don't know how big her role was, because I don't think I saw that episode - I lost interest in Friends a couple of seasons ago.) Perhaps all her lack of success proves is that an actress who looked a total knockout in Ramsay Street looks pretty ordinary by Hollywood standards. (I know, it's not just about her physical attributes and appearance. But for an actress trying to break into US TV it's mostly about that, at least until she can luck into a role that lets her show whether she can act.)

I know Russell Crowe was in Neighbours way back in 1987, but somehow I don't really think of him as a former Ramsay Street resident. Guy Pearce I'd forgotten about, but rather than concede the point I'm going to jump on the "but he isn't doing TV now" exception you so kindly pointed out. :-)

Posted by: John at May 26, 2004 10:05 PM

Without a Trace is my favourite TV show of all time, for the future which i am hoping to achieve is similar to the show. But the person who really inspires me to achieve my goals is Eric Close who works on the Missing Persons Unit as a detective. i know that TV shows and reality do not compare to eachother, however, they do realte and a relation is all that i need to forefil my dream

Posted by: Andrea at October 4, 2004 02:04 PM

One paparazzi? Did anyone else spot the less than deliberate error (over and over again) in tonight's script? I thought they purported to be portraying intelligent FBI officers!

Posted by: Tony Glasbey at October 18, 2004 11:06 PM

Nope, I missed that one completely. (Assuming, that is, that you're alluding to the fact that the singular noun is "paparazzo".)

Posted by: John at October 19, 2004 12:17 AM

Heh. My wife knows someone whose cat is called "i Pagliacci" (apart from the sheer pretentiousness, the owner has failed to grasp that it's plural, so the cat's name is "the clowns").

Posted by: Ray at October 19, 2004 03:37 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)