<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sore Eyes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soreeyes.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soreeyes.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oh, Barcelona&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/02/oh-barcelona/</link>
		<comments>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/02/oh-barcelona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/?p=6838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The very definition of irony. [Via Memex 1.1]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very definition of <a title="Orwell turning in his grave? &#171; Poumista" href="http://poumista.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/orwell-turning-in-his-grave/">irony</a>.</p>
<p>
<span class="via">[Via <a href="http://memex.naughtons.org/archives/2012/02/02/15337">Memex 1.1</a>]</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/02/oh-barcelona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signal To Noise</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/02/signal-to-noise/</link>
		<comments>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/02/signal-to-noise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/?p=6836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tend to like my time lapse videos plain. If the film maker can deploy their skills and equipment at a suitable location in order to compress time and reveal how the night sky shifts as the planet turns under it &#8211; or how the clouds break on mountaintops like surf, or to show me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to like my time lapse videos plain. If the film maker can deploy their skills and equipment at a suitable location in order to compress time and reveal how the night sky shifts as the planet turns under it &#8211; or how the clouds break on mountaintops like surf, or to show me just how much ground a slow moving machine covers over the space of a week &#8211; then I'll lap it up.</p>
<p><a title="Signal To Noise on Vimeo" href="http://vimeo.com/35820201">Signal To Noise</a> isn't that sort of time lapse video. It's flashier and is clearly going for visual impact rather than trying to impart information to the viewer,<sup><a href="http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/02/signal-to-noise/#footnote_0_6836" id="identifier_0_6836" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="True, the overlaid graphics are nothing but information. But they&amp;#8217;re mostly displayed too briefly for a viewer to catch them at first glance so I do class them as being there for effect.">1</a></sup> but it's so beautifully done that I enjoyed it quite a bit anyway. Definitely worth a look.</p>
<p>
<span class="via">[Via <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/01/30/strange-yet-cool-vla-time-lapse-video/">Bad Astronomy</a>]</span></p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_6836" class="footnote">True, the overlaid graphics are nothing <em>but</em> information. But they're mostly displayed too briefly for a viewer to catch them at first glance so I do class them as being there for effect.</li></ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/02/signal-to-noise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>60?</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/01/60-2/</link>
		<comments>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/01/60-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/?p=6834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The main thing I took away from this Q&#38;A with Jeff Goldblum isn't anything in the interview itself. It's this bit at the end: In short Born: Pittsburgh, 1952 Jeff Goldblum will turn 60 later this year. 60! How the hell did that happen?1 Yes, this is basically yet another "I feel so old" post. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main thing I took away from <a title="Portrait of the artist: Jeff Goldblum, actor | Culture | The Guardian" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2012/jan/31/jeff-goldblum-actor">this Q&amp;A with Jeff Goldblum</a> isn't anything in the interview itself. It's this bit at the end:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="font-weight:bold;">In short</p>
<p>Born: Pittsburgh, 1952</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Jeff Goldblum will turn 60 later this year. 60! How the hell did that happen?<sup><a href="http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/01/60-2/#footnote_0_6834" id="identifier_0_6834" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="Yes, this is basically yet another &amp;#8220;I feel so old&amp;#8221; post. But can you blame me?">1</a></sup></p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_6834" class="footnote">Yes, this is basically yet another "I feel so <em>old</em>" post. But can you blame me?</li></ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/01/60-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it any wonder that one day the robots are going to rise up and overthrow their oppressors?</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/01/is-it-any-wonder-that-one-day-the-robots-are-going-to-rise-up-and-overthrow-their-oppressors/</link>
		<comments>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/01/is-it-any-wonder-that-one-day-the-robots-are-going-to-rise-up-and-overthrow-their-oppressors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/?p=6832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sort of cruelty to washing machines seems awfully &#8230; unsporting. I swear that when someone tossed a discarded drive motor in to finish it off at the 3:45 mark I was half expecting the poor beast to send it right back with interest. [Via kottke.org]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sort of <a title="Hotpoint Washer Tears Itself Apart - Grand Final Day Entertainment - YouTube" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_PLnInsh7E">cruelty to washing machines</a> seems awfully &#8230; unsporting.</p>
<p>I swear that when someone tossed a discarded drive motor in to finish it off at the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_PLnInsh7E&amp;t=3m45s">3:45</a> mark I was half expecting the poor beast to send it right back with interest.</p>
<p>
<span class="via">[Via <a href="http://kottke.org/12/02/through-destruction-a-washing-machine-achieves-transcendence">kottke.org</a>]</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/02/01/is-it-any-wonder-that-one-day-the-robots-are-going-to-rise-up-and-overthrow-their-oppressors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Who are those people over there, laughing?&#039;</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/31/who-are-those-people-over-there-laughing/</link>
		<comments>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/31/who-are-those-people-over-there-laughing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obituary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/?p=6829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harry de Quetteville, Obituaries Editor for the Daily Telegraph, on The Art of the Obituary: [It is...] rare for us to reflect on funeral arrangements, although there are exceptions. It may be fitting to note that a Spitfire will fly over the church where a Battle of Britain fighter pilot is being buried, or that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry de Quetteville, Obituaries Editor for the <em>Daily Telegraph</em>, on <a title="The Art of the Obituary - Telegraph" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/9047401/The-Art-of-the-Obituary.html">The Art of the Obituary</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
  [It is...] rare for us to reflect on funeral arrangements, although there are exceptions. It may be fitting to note that a Spitfire will fly over the church where a Battle of Britain fighter pilot is being buried, or that the proprietor of a famous haunt for sozzled actors has asked for mourners to come to his funeral in costume and make up. Rob Buckman, the doctor who died last October after a career which was devoted to improving the way medics counsel the terminally ill, left instructions for a recording to be played at his own interment. It was to run: <em>"Thank you so much for coming. Unlike the rest of you, I don't have to get up in the morning."</em>
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/31/who-are-those-people-over-there-laughing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spot the film</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/31/spot-the-film/</link>
		<comments>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/31/spot-the-film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/?p=6827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you tell the movie from the book cover? I only got 5 out of 20. Pretty poor, really, considering that I reckon 4 out of the 20 are blindingly obvious or easily guessable.1 [Via LinkMachineGo!] Though one of those 4 requires you to know the name of the source novel rather than that of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Flick Books - Can you tell the movie from the book Cover? | Monkeon / Web Design Leeds" href="http://www.monkeon.co.uk/bookmovies/">Can you tell the movie from the book cover?</a></p>
<p>I only got 5 out of 20. Pretty poor, really, considering that I reckon 4 out of the 20 are blindingly obvious or easily guessable.<sup><a href="http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/31/spot-the-film/#footnote_0_6827" id="identifier_0_6827" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="Though one of those 4 requires you to know the name of the source novel rather than that of the film.">1</a></sup></p>
<p>
<span class="via">[Via <a href="http://www.timemachinego.com/linkmachinego/2012/01/31/can-you-tell-a-movie-from-its-original-book-cover/">LinkMachineGo!</a>]</span></p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_6827" class="footnote">Though one of those 4 requires you to know the name of the source novel rather than that of the film.</li></ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/31/spot-the-film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;We are dealing with a certain element of human nature that is unknown how to deal with.&#039;</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/31/we-are-dealing-with-a-certain-element-of-human-nature-that-is-unknown-how-to-deal-with/</link>
		<comments>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/31/we-are-dealing-with-a-certain-element-of-human-nature-that-is-unknown-how-to-deal-with/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/?p=6825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Skirboll writes in praise of an invention whose time has come (again): Thomas Watson was a respectful man. He was working as an assistant to Alexander Graham Bell in 1876 when his name became the first to be uttered into Bell's new invention, the telephone. "Mr. Watson, come here," Bell famously said. "I want [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron Skirboll writes in praise of <a title="Enjoy the Silence - The Morning News" href="http://www.themorningnews.org/article/enjoy-the-silence">an invention whose time has come (again)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
  Thomas Watson was a respectful man. He was working as an assistant to Alexander Graham Bell in 1876 when his name became the first to be uttered into Bell's new invention, the telephone. <em>"Mr. Watson, come here,"</em> Bell famously said. <em>"I want to see you."</em> Even before this monumental moment, however, Watson had proved his worth &#8211; and his neighborliness. While working out the telephone's kinks with Bell from his apartment, Watson initially had to shout to be heard over the early equipment, prompting complaints from the neighbors. So Watson, ever the courteous gent, wrapped himself inside blanket during these initial telephone trials, creating a tunnel, and, thus, the world's first phone booth: society's great unused invention. [...]
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/31/we-are-dealing-with-a-certain-element-of-human-nature-that-is-unknown-how-to-deal-with/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goddamn map doesn&#039;t show this shit!</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/30/goddamn-map-doesnt-show-this-shit/</link>
		<comments>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/30/goddamn-map-doesnt-show-this-shit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/?p=6823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q. Why are software development task estimations regularly off by a factor of 2-3? A. Let's take a hike on the coast from San Francisco to Los Angeles to visit our friends in Newport Beach&#8230; [Via Marco.org]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q. Why are software development task estimations regularly off by a factor of 2-3?</p>
<p>A. <a title="Michael Wolfe's answer to Engineering Management: Why are software development task estimations regularly off by a factor of 2-3? - Quora" href="http://www.quora.com/Engineering-Management/Why-are-software-development-task-estimations-regularly-off-by-a-factor-of-2-3/answer/Michael-Wolfe">Let's take a hike on the coast from San Francisco to Los Angeles to visit our friends in Newport Beach&#8230;</a></p>
<p>
<span class="via">[Via <a href="http://www.marco.org/2012/01/30/software-development-estimates">Marco.org</a>]</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/30/goddamn-map-doesnt-show-this-shit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freezing woman</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/30/freezing-woman/</link>
		<comments>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/30/freezing-woman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burning man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switzerland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/?p=6821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reflections by danah boyd on her first visit to the World Economic Forum in Davos: Comparing WEF to any other event is hard, but I cracked a smile when Nick Bilton remarked that WEF is a lot like Burning Man. In so many ways, he's right. A lot of people overwhelm one extreme weather location [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reflections by danah boyd on <a title="danah boyd | apophenia &#187; World Economic Forum: More than Meets the Eye" href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2012/01/29/wef-davos.html">her first visit</a> to the <a title="World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2012" href="http://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2012">World Economic Forum</a> in Davos:</p>
<blockquote><p>
  Comparing WEF to any other event is hard, but I cracked a smile when Nick Bilton remarked that WEF is a lot like Burning Man. In so many ways, he's right. A lot of people overwhelm one extreme weather location and battle non-normative conditions (Davos is crowded, covered in ice, and extremely difficult to navigate) to interact with others. In both events, there are so many different kinds of communities colliding &#8211; sometimes interacting and sometimes not. And both cost gobs of money to attend, thereby excluding all sorts of people.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/30/freezing-woman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amen to that</title>
		<link>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/29/amen-to-that/</link>
		<comments>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/29/amen-to-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soreeyes.org/?p=6819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet of the week, courtesy of @kjhealy, a.k.a. Kieran Healy: Alain de Botton plans to build a series of temples for atheists. Apparently he has never heard of Apple Stores. dezeen.com/2012/01/25/ala&#8230; [Via Crooked Timber]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tweet of the week, <a title="Twitter / @kjhealy: Alain de Botton plans to b ..." href="https://twitter.com/#!/kjhealy/status/162144838689628160">courtesy of @kjhealy</a>, <em>a.k.a.</em> Kieran Healy:</p>
<blockquote><p>
  Alain de Botton plans to build a series of temples for atheists. Apparently he has never heard of Apple Stores. <a href="http://www.dezeen.com/2012/01/25/alain-de-botton-plans-temples-for-atheists/">dezeen.com/2012/01/25/ala&#8230;</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>
<span class="via">[Via <a href="http://crookedtimber.org/2012/01/27/an-atheist-temple/#comment-399394">Crooked Timber</a>]</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soreeyes.org/archive/2012/01/29/amen-to-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

