One day Mark Zuckerberg probably is going to roll out a Facebook update that makes Futurebook a reality.
Australia's ABC News on China's plans to leave no dark corner when it comes to monitoring the populace's lives online:
Dandan doesn't object to the prospect of life under the state's all-seeing surveillance network. [...] The 36-year-old knows social credit is not a perfect system but believes it's the best way to manage a complex country with the world's biggest population. [...]
Under an existing financial credit scheme called Sesame Credit, Dandan has a very high score of 770 out of 800 - she is very much the loyal Chinese citizen.
Just for the record, I hated the visual style of this piece - way too much scrolling over images to get to the next piece of the text - but the content is decent. The really worrying prospect of this stuff is how easy a sell a European edition of the Social Credit software is going to be to a certain type of centrist politician.1
The term 'social credit' should be as despised as the term 'meritocracy', properly understood, deserves to be, but give it a decade or so and - barring a backlash against the level of surveillance and the consequences for ordinary citizens having brought down the Chinese government in the meantime - you're going to see a huge bunfight as every careerist with half an eye on Number 10 decides that this is exactly what the UK needs to get the populace to shape up. We can but hope that they get the successors of the Government Digital Service to try to implement a UK version, so that with any luck it'll show up years late and barely functional and the world will have moved on to the next big idea.
Having caught up with Kashmir Hill's Gizmodo piece 'People You May Know:' A Controversial Facebook Feature's 10-Year History, I'm both supremely glad that I'm not on Facebook 1 and creeped out by how little difference that makes to Facebook's determination to shadow profile me whether I like it or not.
In other words, People You May Know is an invaluable product because it helps connect Facebook users, whether they want to be connected or not. It seems clear that for some users, People You May Know is a problem. It's not a feature they want and not a feature they want to be part of. When the feature debuted in 2008, Facebook said that if you didn't like it, you could "x" out the people who appeared there repeatedly and eventually it would disappear. (If you don't see the feature on your own Facebook page, that may be the reason why.) But that wouldn't stop you from continuing to be recommended to other users.
Facebook needs to give people a hard out for the feature, because scourging phone address books and email inboxes to connect you with other Facebook users, while welcome to some people, is offensive and harmful to others. Through its aggressive data-mining this huge corporation is gaining unwanted insight into our medical privacy, past heartaches, family dramas, sensitive work associations, and random one-time encounters.
[Via Pixel Envy]